Select New Queue Manager from the pop-up menu. Enter the name for your queue manager. All names in WebSphere MQ are case sensitive. Using all capital letters for names helps avoid confusion. The names in the example are suggestions. You can use different names if you choose. Fill in names for the default transmission queue and dead letter queue. Check the box to make this your default queue manager.
The next screen indicates the type of logging that the queue manager will perform, and the maximum number of log files that can be produced.
The following step enables the WebSphere MQ applications that are running on your machine to communicate with other machines. This is the default port number for WebSphere MQ. Check with your system administrator to verify that this is the correct port to use. Click Finish to create your queue manager. It might take a minute to create and start the queue manager. Create one or more local queues for exchanging messages on your queue manager.
These are the queues that SAS applications will use to exchange messages with other applications. Right-click Queues , then select New Local Queue from the popup menu.
In the Queue Name field, enter the name of the local queue that you want to create. This queue name is specified in any application programs that use WebSphere MQ. On this screen, you might want to change the Default Persistence value from Not Persistent to Persistent. This enables messages to remain in the queue even if the queue manager is shut down. Click the various tabs to see the types of values that can be defined. If you will be using high-volume messaging applications like scoring, you might want to change another default value.
A queue is a container for messages. Messages can be retrieved from, or added to, the queue, one at a time, by applications that are connected to the queue manager that owns the queue. Channels are of two types.
A message channel is a unidirectional communications link between two queue managers that is used to transfer messages between them. Figure 1 depicts the architecture of a WebSphere MQ server:. For communication to resume, administrators should first figure out where the real problem lies.
Privacy Policy Terms of Use. How will I know where I want to use it and when? Why not just stick with more rudimentary forms of interprocess messaging? All the explanations so far are accurate and to the point - but might be missing something: one of the main benefits of message queueing: resilience. Imagine this: you need to communicate with two or three other systems. A common approach these days will be web services which is fine if you need an answers right away.
However: web services can be down and not available - what do you do then? So in many cases, using message queues to connect disparate systems is a more reliable, more robust way of sending messages back and forth. It doesn't work well for everything if you want to know the current stock price for MSFT, putting that request into a queue might not be the best of ideas - but in lots of cases, like putting an order into your supplier's message queue, it works really well and can help ease some of the reliability issues with other technologies.
It's an abstraction layer that allows multiple processes likely on different machines to communicate via various models e. Depending on the implementation, it can be configured for things like guaranteed reliability, error reporting, security, discovery, performance, etc.
For example: Suppose you want to processes to communicate, but one of them can die in the middle and later get reconnected. How would you ensure that interim messages were not lost? MQ solutions can do that for you. Message queueuing systems are supposed to give you several bonuses.
Among most important ones are monitoring and transactional behavior. Transactional design is important if you want to be immune to failures, such as power failure. Imagine that you want to notify a bank system of ATM money withdrawal, and it has to be done exactly once per request, no matter what servers failed temporarily in the middle. MQ systems would allow you to coordinate transactions across multiple database, MQ and other systems.
Needless to say, such systems are very slow compared to named pipes, TCP or other non-transactional tools. If high performance is required, you would not allow your messages to be written thru disk. Instead, it will complicate your design - to achieve exotic reliable AND fast communication, which pushes the designer into really non-trivial tricks. The Message Queue receives the message, places it in the proper queue, and waits for the application to retrieve the message when ready.
As an extension to that; what if your local network and your local pc is down as well??
0コメント